Cases 11 - 20 of 1,086
Kenney v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
John Kenney
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7402 Refund of Taxes
United States of America v. $34,500.00 in United States Currency
as 2:2024cv00060
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
$34,500.00 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
United States of America v. $12,521.00 in United States Currency
as 2:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$12,521.00 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Sejdiu v. United States
as 5:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Idriz Sejdiu
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Bush v. Gilley et al
as 6:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Daymon Maurice Bush
Respondent:
J. Gilley, BOP and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Stokes v. Garland et al
as 6:2023cv00206
Petitioner:
Anthony Darnell Stokes
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Gary Swaney and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
