Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Gonzalez v. USA
as 6:2013cv00016
Petitioner:
Alejandro J. Gonzalez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pacer Health Corporation et al v. Anand et al
as 5:2013cv00014
Plaintiff:
Pacer Health Corporation , Rainier Gonzalez and John Chi
Defendant:
Ashwini Anand and Satyabrata Chatterjee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gonzalez-Jose v. USA
as 3:2012cv07241
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Gonzalez-Mejia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2012cv00106
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
USA v. Sierra et al
as 3:2011cv00079
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Juan Diego Gonzalez Sierra and Maria Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Gonzalez-Valasquez v. Grouse
as 5:2011cv00214
Plaintiff:
Henry Gonzalez-Valasquez
Defendant:
Michael Growse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gonzalez et al v. Lusardi et al
as 2:2010cv00142
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gonzalez , Theresa Principata , Betsy Miller and others
Defendant:
Michael Lusardi, Joshua Bornhorn, Fulton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fitch v. Gonzalez et al
as 6:2008cv00366
Plaintiff:
Lamont C. Fitch
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzalez, Harley G. Lappin, Michael Mukasey and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Wilson v. Gonzalez et al
as 7:2007cv00223
Petitioner:
Jermain A. Wilson
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzalez and Hector Rios, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Parker v. Gonzalez et al
as 7:2007cv00181
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Parker
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzalez, Gregory Van Tatenhove, Joseph M. Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
