Cases 21 - 30 of 446
Sutherland v. Warden David Paul
as 5:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Eric Clifford Sutherland and Eric C. Sutherland
Defendant:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hightower v. Crews et al
as 5:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
James Hightower
Respondent:
Commissioner Cookie Crews, Branch Manager Jennifer Travis, Warden Kevin Mazza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Alsip v. Warden David Paul
as 5:2023cv00344
Petitioner:
Hachelle Alsip
Respondent:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robertson v. Paul
as 5:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Demetrius M. Robertson
Respondent:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vanwinkle v. Sgt Sizemore et al
as 5:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Donald Vanwinkle
Defendant:
Sgt Sizemore, C.O. Roberts, R.N. Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petrey v. Mazza, et al
as 2:2023cv00169
Petitioner:
William Royal Petrey
Respondent:
Warden Kevin Mazza, Supreme Court of Kentucky, Kentucky Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Laureti v. Warden FCI-MIAMI et al
as 6:2023cv00216
Petitioner:
Marco Laureti
Respondent:
Warden FCI-MIAMI and O Lua
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Paul
as 5:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Rafael Jones
Defendant:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas v. Warden
as 6:2024cv00004
Petitioner:
Albert Thomas, III
Respondent:
USP McCreary Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Salas v. Swaney
as 6:2023cv00205
Petitioner:
Juan A. Salas
Respondent:
Warden Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
