Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Bingham v. Russell et al
as 7:2009cv00158
Petitioner:
David Willis Bingham
Respondent:
Donna Russell, Shirley Bingham, John David Preston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goforth et al v. Laurel County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 6:2009cv00268
Plaintiff:
James Goforth and Peggy Goforth
Defendant:
Laurel County Sheriff's Dept. and Richard Sapcut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Warick v. Justice and Public Safety Cabinet et al
as 7:2008cv00146
Plaintiff:
Gary D. Warick
Defendant:
Justice and Public Safety Cabinet, Department of Corrections, George R. Million and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mullins v. City of Jackson et al
as 5:2008cv00286
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Mullins
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Jackson Police Dept, John Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Colebrook v. Ky. Dept. of Motor Vehicle Enforcement et al
as 2:2008cv00110
Plaintiff:
John Colebrook
Defendant:
Ky. Dept. of Motor Vehicle Enforcement, Mark Scott, Kentucky State Police and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hall v. Arnold et al
as 5:2007cv00202
Plaintiff:
Sharon M. Hall
Defendant:
Warden Arnold, Warden Chief Hodge, Warden Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson et al v. Lexington Fayette Urban County Government et al
as 5:2007cv00095
Plaintiff:
Kathy Wilson, Charles Wilson and Estate of Isabelle Moore/ Eh
Defendant:
Lexington Fayette Urban County Government, Karen Hobbs, Legal Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Thompson v. CCA-LAC Medical Dept. et al
as 5:2007cv00051
Plaintiff:
Mike Thompson
Defendant:
CCA-LAC Medical Dept., CCA-LAC Medical Dept., Vermont Department of Correction Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
