Cases 51 - 60 of 446
Frazer v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
John J. Frazer
Defendant:
United States of America and Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Young v. Warden
as 6:2023cv00137
Petitioner:
Joseph Young
Respondent:
USP McCreary Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
King v. Paul, Warden
as 5:2023cv00207
Petitioner:
Daaron Edward King
Respondent:
David Paul, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Doe v. Boyce et al
as 0:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Todd Boyce, Head Chaplin Todd Boyce, James David Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avant v. Gilley et al
as 6:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
Cordell Avant
Defendant:
Warden Gilley, Miller, Schrek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Avant v. Gilley
as 6:2023cv00121
Petitioner:
Cordell Avant
Respondent:
Warden Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Colvin v. Gilley
as 6:2023cv00122
Petitioner:
Joseph Colvin
Respondent:
Warden Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
El-Bey v. Warden at FMC Lexington et al
as 5:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
Jttonali One Eye El-Bey
Defendant:
Warden at FMC Lexington and C.O. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Casamayor v. Warden of U.S.P. McCreary
as 6:2023cv00105
Petitioner:
Daniel Casamayor
Defendant:
Warden of U.S.P. McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ragland v. Paul, Warden
as 5:2023cv00160
Petitioner:
James Ragland
Respondent:
David Paul, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
