Cases 71 - 80 of 138
Wooton et al v. Powell County et al
as 5:2014cv00397
Plaintiff:
Buster Wooton, Jr. and Wesley Collins
Defendant:
Powell County and Fiscal Court of Powell County, Powell County Sheriff Department, Danny Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallen v. Eli Lilly & Co. et al
as 6:2014cv00156
Plaintiff:
Danny L. Wallen
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Co. and Lilly USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gamble v. Commissioner of SSA
as 7:2014cv00091
Plaintiff:
Danny B Gamble
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Miller v. Harlan, Kentucky et al
as 6:2014cv00130
Plaintiff:
Josh L. Miller
Defendant:
City of Harlan, Kentucky, City of Harlan Police Department, Danny Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose et al v. McCreary County, Kentucky et al
as 6:2014cv00111
Plaintiff:
Charles Axl Rose
Defendant:
McCreary County, Kentucky, Gus Skinner, Joe Horn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ousley v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government et al
as 5:2014cv00168
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Ousley
Defendant:
Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government, Lexington-Fayette Urban County Division of Police, Keith J. Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Spurlock et al
as 7:2014cv00063
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Linda Spurlock, Linda Spurlock Unknown Spouse of and Danny Spurlock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Montgomery v. Taylor
as 3:2014cv00026
Petitioner:
Danny Montgomery
Respondent:
Clark Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
The Verizon Employee Benefits Committee v. Johnson et al
as 5:2014cv00086
Plaintiff:
The Verizon Employee Benefits Committee
Defendant:
Danny Johnson and Hilliard Lyons
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
