Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Dougherty et al v. Whitehorse Freight, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Mark Dougherty, Parker Roth, Marcus Moreno and others
Defendant:
Whitehorse Freight, LLC and Michael Bilokonsky
Parker v. SSA
as 6:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Amanda R. Parker
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kelsey v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government et al
as 5:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Scott Michael Kelsey
Defendant:
Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government, Lisa Farmer, Rodney Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivers v. Parker et al
as 6:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Keith Rivers
Defendant:
Larry Parker, Daniel Kanyam, Joy Levine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parker et al v. Ferguson et al
as 6:2023cv00128
Executor:
Kim Parker
Plaintiff:
H.M., W.M.H. and Frances Hurley
Defendant:
Gary Ferguson, Hailey Mosley, Lisa Hobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Parker et al v. Ferguson et al
as 6:2023cv00091
Executor:
Kim Parker
Plaintiff:
H.M. and W.M.H.
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Frances Hurley
Defendant:
Gary Ferguson, Hailey Mosley, Lisa Hobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Warden
as 6:2023cv00070
Petitioner:
Michael Jerome Parker
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Myers et al v. Parker, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Ben Myers and Alisa Lask
Defendant:
Parker, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Parker v. Dixon-Bullock
as 3:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Montrell Parker
Defendant:
Judge Linda Dixon-Bullock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Shannon v. Thacker et al
as 5:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Mark Shannon
Defendant:
Desirae Thacker, Parker CrayCraft, Helby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
