Cases 151 - 160 of 1,996
Watkins v. Hale
as 3:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
GeneDeShawn M. Watkins
Defendant:
Judge David J. Hale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rashad v. Ryder System, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Rashad
Defendant:
Ryder System, Inc., Visionary Sleep, LLC and Gustafson's Furniture
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Dunbar v. Clark et al
as 3:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Dairlwen Javon Dunbar
Defendant:
Dwayne Clark, Steve Durham, Eric Troutman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Carter v. Logsdon
as 4:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
LaDonna Sue Carter
Defendant:
Jeremy Logsdon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kuiper v. Schulte et al
as 3:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Michelle Kuiper
Defendant:
William John Schulte, Doug Sweeney and Mike Minniear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Glass v. Polyconcept North America et al
as 1:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Brandy Kay Glass
Defendant:
Polyconcept North America, Cara Boyd, Tom Medice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
King Kevin v. United States Supreme Court
as 4:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
King Kevin and George Kevin Quinn
Defendant:
United States Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsey et al v. Bailey et al
as 4:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Lindsey and Kaysanndra Lorene Lindsey
Defendant:
Ryan Bailey and Christopher Roush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Pascoe v. Brinkley, et al
as 3:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Christopher Pascoe
Defendant:
Brandon Lee Brinkley and John N. Lyons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pascoe v. Young et al
as 3:2023cv00005
Defendant:
William Shane Richardson, Thomas Young, Joey Board and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Pascoe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
