Cases 111 - 120 of 172
Plummer v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 3:2011cv00110
Plaintiff:
Claude E. Plummer
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scherzinger v. Bolton et al
as 3:2011cv00011
Plaintiff:
William Scherzinger
Defendant:
Mark Bolton , Louisville Metro Government , John and/or Jane Doe 1-15 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Broughman v. Webster County, Kentucky et al
as 4:2010cv00152
Plaintiff:
Bradley Broughman
Defendant:
Webster County, Kentucky , Terry Elder , Unnamed Guards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pettus v. Deputy Fulk et al
as 5:2010cv00201
Plaintiff:
Timothy B. Pettus
Defendant:
Deputy Fulk, Nurse and Christian County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruitt et al v. Austin Food Service et al
as 3:2010cv00564
Plaintiff:
Curtis L. Pruitt and Antonio Q. Anthony
Defendant:
Austin Food Service, Austin Burkhart and A. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Veech, et al
as 3:2010cv00461
Plaintiff:
Juan D. Johnson
Defendant:
Sharon Veech, Ann Razor and Allen Stump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. Daviess County Detention Center et al
as 3:2010cv00408
Plaintiff:
Daltonia Duncan
Defendant:
Daviess County Detention Center, Jim Ford, John Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baze v. Huddleston et al
as 5:2010cv00086
Plaintiff:
Ralph Baze
Defendant:
Hobert Huddleston, Tom Simpson, LaDonna Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Louisville Metro Police et al
as 3:2010cv00272
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Rodgers Ferguson
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Police, Sheriff Department and Public Defenders Advocacy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. United States of America et al
as 4:2010cv00047
Plaintiff:
Herbert R. Smith
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Parole Commission, United States Marshal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
