Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Yates v. Cabinet Health & family Services.
as 1:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Shally Ann Yates
Defendant:
Cabinet Health & family Services.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thomas v. Holland et al
as 3:2022cv00609
Plaintiff:
Steven D. Thomas
Defendant:
Casey Holland, Ann Schiavone Dyke, Michael Smithers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goodall v. Caper et al
as 3:2022cv00543
Plaintiff:
Angela V. Goodall
Defendant:
Beth Caper, Judge Ann Delahanty, Judge Susan Schultz Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Deng v. Smith et al
as 3:2021cv00539
Plaintiff:
Ngong L. Deng
Defendant:
Judge Ann Bailey Smith, Judge Barry Willett, Judge Erica Lee Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swint et al v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 3:2021cv00306
Defendant:
SAB Miller Company, Central Intelligence Agency, Anheuser-Busch In Bev and others
Plaintiff:
Robert James Swint and Sheila Ann Brace-Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd et al v. Karem
as 3:2021cv00058
Defendant:
Anne Haynie and Annette Karem
Plaintiff:
Toni Floyd and Cheri Nicholson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00032
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Evans v. The Kroger Co. Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00878
Defendant:
UFCW Local Union, #227, Robert Blair, The Kroger Co. Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
