Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Edwards v. KY Family Court et al
as 3:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
Garry Dewayne Edwards
Defendant:
KY Family Court, Jane Venters, Kent Hendrickson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Hicks et al v. Resurrection Kingdom Center, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Pamela Hicks, Richard Hicks and Resurrection Kingdom Center, Inc.
Defendant:
Sheriff Ronnie Giles, Ballard County Fiscal Court, Amanda Branham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Jones et al
as 3:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Wendy Marie Johnson and James Arthur Johnson
Defendant:
Ethan Jones, Chase McKeown, Thomas Minter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. U.S. Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv00478
Plaintiff:
Kayla Marie Jones
Defendant:
U.S. Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
