Cases 91 - 100 of 162
Edmonson v. Louisville Metro Government et al
as 3:2017cv00658
Plaintiff:
Stephon Edmonson
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Government, Louisville Metro Department of Corrections, Mark Bolton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benton v. Louisville Metro Government et al
as 3:2017cv00587
Plaintiff:
Michael Benton
Defendant:
Louisville Metropolitan Government, Louisville Metro Department of Corrections, Mark Bolton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamlin v. Clark et al
as 1:2017cv00159
Plaintiff:
James Dee Hamlin, III
Defendant:
Danny Wayne Clark and Teddy Couch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke v. People of the State Kentucky et al
as 1:2017cv00057
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Burke, Jr.
Defendant:
People of the State Kentucky, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Eric R. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Ramey et al
as 5:2017cv00044
Plaintiff:
Wilson Reese Clark
Defendant:
Karen Ramey, Bruce Bauer, Jill Shelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. LMDC et al
as 3:2016cv00728
Plaintiff:
Gerry Eugene Lawson
Defendant:
LMDC, Mark Bolton, Dwayne Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones-Bey v. Jefferson County Government et al
as 3:2016cv00657
Plaintiff:
Gary Lamar Jones-Bey
Defendant:
Jefferson County Government, Mark E. Bolton, Stephen P. Durham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Staub v. Nietzel et al
as 3:2015cv00689
Plaintiff:
Steven Staub
Defendant:
Tracy Nietzel, Marcus Faulkner, Jonathon Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Bolton et al
as 3:2014cv00580
Plaintiff:
Martin Albert Gordon
Defendant:
Mark Bolton, Dewayne Clark, Eric Troutman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Brantley et al
as 4:2014cv00083
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Clark
Defendant:
James Brantley and David Massamore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
