Cases 31 - 40 of 95
Pierson v. Grayson County Detention Center et al
as 4:2018cv00068
Plaintiff:
Devan Lamont Pierson
Defendant:
Grayson County Detention Center, Unknown Nurse "A, Unknown Nurse "I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorson v. United States of America et al
as 4:2018cv00052
Petitioner:
Corey A. Thorson
Defendant:
United States of America and U.S. Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Adams v. Tangilag et al
as 5:2017cv00161
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Adams
Defendant:
Shastine Tangilag, Louis Forte, Correct Care Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bekhtyar v. Grayson County Detention Center et al
as 4:2017cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jamal Bekhtyar
Defendant:
Grayson County Detention Center, United States Marshal's Service and Michael Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Downer v. Bolton et al
as 3:2017cv00341
Plaintiff:
Freddie Lee Downer, Jr.
Defendant:
Mark Bolton, Classification, Medical Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. First Baptist Church et al
as 5:2017cv00054
Plaintiff:
Clarence L. Russell
Defendant:
First Baptist Church, Jeff Bowman, Centri-Kid Camp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harden v. State of Kentucky et al
as 3:2016cv00640
Plaintiff:
Robert Harden
Defendant:
State of Kentucky, Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Lee Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balcar v. Smith et al
as 3:2016cv00599
Plaintiff:
Yale Larry Balcar
Defendant:
Aaron Smith, Rodney Ballard and Correct Care Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharber v. Bolton et al
as 3:2016cv00526
Plaintiff:
Darryn Brett Sharber
Defendant:
Mark Bolton, City of Louisville, Louisville Metro Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byas v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 5:2016cv00121
Plaintiff:
Micah M. Byas
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Ballard County Court, Carlisle County Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
