Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Simmons v. Aramark
as 3:2016cv00120
Plaintiff:
Anthony W. Simmons
Defendant:
Aramark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crowdus v. Catholic Health Initiatives, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00094
Plaintiff:
Dekel Crowdus
Defendant:
Catholic Health Initiatives, Inc. and Aramark Facility Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Burke et al v. Thompson et al
as 5:2015cv00156
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Burke, Jr. and Jeremy Todd West
Defendant:
LaDonna Thompson, Randy White, Joel Dunlap and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Pruitt v. Roederer Correctional Complex et al
as 3:2014cv00056
Plaintiff:
Arthur Pruitt
Defendant:
Roederer Correctional Complex, Aramark Food Service, Mike Meadows and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Aramark Healthcare Support Services, LLC
as 3:2012cv00430
Plaintiff:
Danny Bryant
Defendant:
Aramark Healthcare Support Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Aramark Healthcare Support Services, LLC
as 3:2012cv00510
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Smith
Defendant:
Aramark Healthcare Support Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Aramark et al
as 3:2011cv00517
Plaintiff:
Ricky L. Johnson
Defendant:
Aramark, Cookie Crews, Jane and John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 5:2010cv00043
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Jazz Adams, Rodney Grimes, Marcus Carey and others
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Kentucky Department of Corrections, Samuel Fletcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Aramark Correctional Services, et al
as 3:2009cv00160
Plaintiff:
John Robert Edwards, Jr.
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Steve Haney and Craig Hughes
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
