Cases 11 - 20 of 1,303
Morris et al v. Medtronic Minimed, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Morris, Kevin Lane Morris, Timothy Ethan Morris and others
Defendant:
Medtronic Minimed, Inc., Minimed Distribution Corp., Medtronic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Mitchell v. Officer James et al
as 5:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Cindy Mitchell
Defendant:
Officer James and Nurse John
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Maness et al
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Clarence Vaughn
Defendant:
Blake Maness, John Michael Hill, David Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Wellpath LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Smith
Defendant:
Wellpath LLC, Karmen Penrose, Kannitha West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Senior et al v. PAM Transport, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Lerlaine J. Senior, A.C. and Ai.C.
Defendant:
PAM Transport, Inc. and John W. Heavener
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 mv Removal- Motor Vehicle
Fisher v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
John Fisher
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Violett v. Grise et al
as 1:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Violett
Respondent:
Judge John R. Grise and Warden Anna Valentine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doe v. Burlew
as 4:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
John Burlew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
