Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Montenegro v. Hall Bros Transportation Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00030
Plaintiff:
Kelly J. Montenegro
Defendant:
Hall Bros Transportation Co., Inc. , Russell J. Freeman , Shields Transport LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Freeman v. Easy Mobile Labs, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00018
Plaintiff:
Jonna Freeman
Defendant:
Easy Mobile Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216
Freeman et al v. Justice et al
as 3:2015cv00709
Plaintiff:
Linda Gail Freeman
Defendant:
David Justice and Heritage - Crystal Clean, LLC
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
David Justice and Heritage - Crystal Clean, LLC
Thirdparty_defendant:
Unknown Third-Party Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Washington-Freeman v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00974
Plaintiff:
Joe-Ann Washington-Freeman
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. United States of America
as 3:2014cv00748
Petitioner:
James Freeman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Freeman v. U.S. Department of Labor
as 5:2014cv00114
Defendant:
United States Department of Labor
Plaintiff:
Lynda L. Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7384
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. Freeman
as 5:2013mc00001
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Billy L. Freeman
United States of America v. Freeman
as 3:2012cv00692
Petitioner:
James Franklin Freeman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Autrey v. City of Louisville, Kentucky et al
as 3:2012cv00329
Plaintiff:
Sherita Autrey
Defendant:
City of Louisville, Kentucky, Louisville Metropolitan Police Department, Steve Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
