Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Sanderson v. Healey et al
as 3:2018cv00035
Plaintiff:
Antonio D. Sanderson
Defendant:
Steven Healey, Mike Anderson, Steve Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prescott v. Litteral et al
as 3:2016cv00082
Petitioner:
Kit Prescott
Respondent:
Kathy Litteral and Andy Beshar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Watson v. Young et al
as 1:2013cv00131
Plaintiff:
Mickey D. Watson
Defendant:
Tony Young, Ricky Beningfield, Scott Perian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Delamar v. Mogan et al
as 4:2013cv00047
Plaintiff:
Andy Delamar
Defendant:
Linda Mogan , Cunningham Lindsey U.S., Inc. , Penn-Star Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Chest v. Taylor
as 3:2013cv00294
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lee Chest
Defendant:
Andy Taylor
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Fields v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2012cv00183
Plaintiff:
Andrew Fields III
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Grayson County Dentention Center Deputy Staff, Andy Burnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacey v. Muse et al
as 3:2011cv00502
Plaintiff:
Garry E. Lacey
Defendant:
Andy Muse, Denny Brown, Terry Carl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riches v. The Indianapolis Star et al
as 3:2009cv00278
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
The Indianapolis Star, Gannett Newspaper, Michael G. Kane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Durham v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2008cv00088
Plaintiff:
William Andy Durham
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Fitch v. City of Leitchfield, Kentucky et al
as 4:2008cv00076
Plaintiff:
Lamont C. Fitch
Defendant:
City of Leitchfield, Kentucky, Grayson County Detention Center, Darwin Dennison and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
