Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Mills-Blair v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2012cv00145
Plaintiff:
Stacy L. Mills-Blair
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Harvell v. Ervin et al
as 3:2011cv00525
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harvell
Defendant:
Terris L. Ervin , Blair Logistics, LLC and Sentry Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Blair v. The Pension Committee of Johnson & Johnson
as 3:2011cv00433
Plaintiff:
Lori A. Blair
Defendant:
The Pension Committee of Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Blair v. Byars et al
as 5:2011cv00117
Plaintiff:
Katelan Blair
Defendant:
Kevin Byars and William Hillyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kowalski v. Kowalski et al
as 1:2011cv00053
Plaintiff:
James Lawrence Kowalski
Defendant:
Sandra Phalicia Kowalski, Donald Firkins, Margaret Ryan Huddleston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Western World Insurance Company v. Christian Development Corporation, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00182
Plaintiff:
Western World Insurance Company
Defendant:
Christian Development Corporation, Inc., Brett DuBroja and Patricia Blair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Blair v. Simpson
as 5:2009cv00158
Petitioner:
James Blair
Respondent:
Thomas L. Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blair v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2009cv00062
Plaintiff:
Wendy Lou Blair
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Blair et al v. Byars et al
as 5:2008cv00197
Plaintiff:
Kate Blair, James Anderson and Dwight Warren
Defendant:
Kevin Byars, Ruth Dyars, Pam Mathis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shipp v. Richardson et al
as 3:2007cv00693
Plaintiff:
Chester Shipp
Defendant:
Byron Richardson, Brandon Blair and Lebanon Police Department
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
