Cases 61 - 70 of 95
Hughes v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 3:2011cv00410
Plaintiff:
Cherri Hughes
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Zain v. McCormick et al
as 4:2011cv00018
Plaintiff:
Revel Zain
Defendant:
Hugh McCormick, Ron Herrington, Rollings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes et al v. Blalock et al
as 3:2011cv00066
Plaintiff:
Larry Hughes and Verna Hughes
Defendant:
Lynda Blalock and Ceva Grounds US, L.P./Ashton Leasing LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hood v. Baker Hughes Tool Company, Incorporated et al
as 1:2011cv00015
Plaintiff:
William Lee Hood
Defendant:
Baker Hughes Tool Company, Incorporated, US Bank Bancorp Corporation, National City Bank Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes et al v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00746
Plaintiff:
Marion E. Hughes , Raymond S. Batts , James A. Crume and others
Defendant:
UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Riches v. Hughes et al
as 3:2010cv00493
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Amanda Hughes and Karen Sypher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Hughes et al
as 4:2010cv00094
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Joyce B. Hughes, Eugene Lester Hughes and Erin Capital Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Seal 2 v. USA
as 5:2010cv00130
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hood v. Baker Hughes Tool Company, Inc. and Parts et al
as 3:2010cv00457
Plaintiff:
William Lee Hood
Defendant:
Baker Hughes Tool Company, Inc. and Parts, Hughes Electronics, U.S. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
