Cases 1 - 10 of 275
Mitchell v. Cook et al
as 5:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Cindy Mitchell
Defendant:
Detective Dylan Cook, Detective Beau Green and Sgt. Matthew Scheer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Bowman v. Chambless et al
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Hywel C. Bowman
Defendant:
Michael Chambless, Abby Cassady, Geoffrey Gleitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Department of Corrections Kentucky et al
as 4:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Josie Samantha Hart
Defendant:
Department of Corrections Kentucky and Green River Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Musarra v. Lane et al
as 4:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Michael Musarra
Defendant:
Time Lane, Liggett Morris, Green River Correctional Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Green
as 3:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Khalil Coleman
Defendant:
David Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCullum v. Green
as 3:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Christopher McCullum
Respondent:
J. David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harmon et al v. Goodwin et al
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
I. H., S. H., Teresa M. Harmon and others
Defendant:
Hon. Lori Goodwin, Stephanie Willis, David Nicholson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Green v. Republic Services
as 4:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Jeff Green
Defendant:
Republic Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Green v. BMW Financial Services et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Jeff Green
Defendant:
BMW Financial Services, Ole Jensen and William E. Sicking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Baker v. Green
as 3:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Eugene Lamont Baker
Respondent:
James David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
