Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Grimes v. Stengel et al
as 3:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
Rodney M. Grimes
Defendant:
Gerina D. Whethers, Officer Shelton, Remy Hammock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Summit Locations, LLC et al v. City of Leitchfield, Kentucky et al
as 4:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Summit Locations, LLC and Huntington Outdoor, LLC
Defendant:
City of Leitchfield, Kentucky and Tyler Harrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lee v. Rescare, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00723
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Lee , Sherry Bashful , La'Shauna A. Brown and others
Defendant:
Rescare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Harrell v. Progress Rail Services Corporation
as 5:2013mc00004
Petitioner:
Claude T. Harrell, Jr.
Respondent:
Progress Rail Services Corporation
Lee v. George et al
as 3:2013cv00723
Plaintiff:
John David Lee
Defendant:
Stephen M. George , Stephen Mitchell George, Michelle M. Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Daniel v. Harrell
as 3:2011cv00302
Plaintiff:
Thereasa S. Daniel
Defendant:
Brigatta H. Harrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wiggins et al v. Daymar Colleges Group, LLC et al
as 5:2011cv00036
Plaintiff:
Kevin Wiggins , Jason West , Joseph McConnell and others
Defendant:
Daymar Colleges Group, LLC , Daymar Learning of Paducah, Inc , Daymar Learning of Ohio, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
