Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Brooks v. Next Level Relief, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00365
Plaintiff:
Dwan Brooks, Mark Anthony Carter, Dioveon Allen and others
Defendant:
Next Level Relief, LLC, Brandon Cain and Justin Bowie
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Little et al v. City of Owensboro, Kentucky et al
as 4:2021cv00055
Plaintiff:
Keon Little and Dana Little
Defendant:
Art Ealum, City of Owensboro, Kentucky, M. Hammonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammond v. Jack Rabbit Services, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00838
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Anderson and Sean Hammond
Defendant:
Jack Rabbit USA, LLC, Theodore Kaufman, David Hain and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hammond v. Mazza
as 3:2020cv00751
Petitioner:
Lloyd Hammond
Respondent:
Kevin Mazza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cole v. Hart et al
as 5:2019cv00065
Defendant:
Lieutenit Melissa A. Rogers, Fredrick Rogers, Correctional Officer J. Earls and others
Plaintiff:
Stephanio L. Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin et al v. Skechers USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00470
Plaintiff:
Patricia Martin , Debra Witten , Mary Sanford and others
Defendant:
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. , Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Hammond v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00120
Plaintiff:
Connie Hammond
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
