Cases 1 - 10 of 122
Gaines v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00399
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Pamela L. Gaines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Travis v. McCracken County Jail
as 5:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Pamela S. Travis
Defendant:
McCracken County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Garcia et al
as 1:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Pamela Garcia and Logan County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilpin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Pamela Lynn Gilpin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Cummings v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Pamela Ana Cummings
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Matthews v. New et al
as 3:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Darian Lamar Matthews
Defendant:
Loretta B. New, Sarah Thomas, Pamela E. Maillet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks et al v. Resurrection Kingdom Center, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Pamela Hicks, Richard Hicks and Resurrection Kingdom Center, Inc.
Defendant:
Sheriff Ronnie Giles, Ballard County Fiscal Court, Amanda Branham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Goad v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Pamela J. Goad
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Henderson v. Sutherland et al
as 3:2022cv00426
Plaintiff:
Ernest Henderson
Defendant:
Ashley Sutherland, Clerk Kate Morgan, Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
