Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Hineson v. Wade et al
as 3:2023cv00316
Plaintiff:
Wendy Hineson
Defendant:
Nathan Wade, Kelsie Torres and Amanda Durham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Esparza et al v. Grange Insurance
as 3:2019cv00245
Defendant:
Grange Insurance and Grange Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Cindy Esparza and Armando Alvalos Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Torres-Torres v. Washingting
as 4:2018cv00050
Plaintiff:
Daniel Torres-Torres
Defendant:
Ray Washingting
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00970
Plaintiff:
Franchesca Torres
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Torres v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00671
Plaintiff:
Mary Torres
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Torres v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00609
Plaintiff:
Susan Torres
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Torres v. Triple Crown Gutter Systems Inc
as 3:2011cv00463
Plaintiff:
Darlene Torres
Defendant:
Triple Crown Gutter Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cordero-Orozco et al v. Brown et al
as 1:2009cv00101
Plaintiff:
Ramon Cordero-Orozco, Ramon Cordero-Orozco, Demetrio Corrales-Aguilar and others
Defendant:
Corby Brown, Elliott Brown and Larry Brown
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
United States of America v. Torres
as 3:2008mc00021
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jacqueline Torres
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
