Cases 1 - 10 of 133
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Shannon v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 1:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Mark Shannon
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated, Combe Product, Inc, Combe Laboratories, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
ECC Guns Incorporated v. Rogers
as 3:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
ECC Guns Incorporated
Defendant:
Adam P. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
A.R.T. Transportation, LLC v. Taylor Bus Sales, Incorporated
as 5:2022cv00158
Plaintiff:
A.R.T. Transportation, LLC and Absolute Royal Transportation, LLC
Defendant:
Taylor Bus Sales, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr Fed. Question: Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
Corbett et al v. Cargill Incorporated et al
as 3:2022cv00281
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. Corbett, Jr. and Christopher G. Hunt
Defendant:
Cargill Incorporated and Southern States Cooperative, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
