Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Schambach et al v. Mandeville City et al
as 2:2020cv00214
Defendant:
State of Louisiana Department of Children and Family Services, City of Mandeville, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Schambach and Aurora Schambach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund
as 2:2019cv13425
Defendant:
Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ramirez-Hernandez v. Freeman et al
as 2:2019cv12941
Defendant:
Joseph Freeman, John Doe and Leland Falcon
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Ramirez-Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv12003
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doe v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund
as 2:2019cv11403
Defendant:
Tulane Educational Fund Administration and Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv11232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Floyd v. Dillman et al
as 2:2019cv08769
Defendant:
Leon Canizzaro, Stephen D London, City of New Orleans and others
Plaintiff:
John Floyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0034
W.P. v. Gusman et al
as 2:2019cv02383
Defendant:
Deputy Johnson 2, Deputy Johnson, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
W.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Durant, et al v. Gretna City, et al
as 2:2019cv00147
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Tramell Brooks, Arthur Lawson and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Durant and Nena Fairley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ladesma v. Gusman, Sheriff Orleans Parish et al
as 2:2018cv12143
Defendant:
Deputy Harris, John Doe, Wal-Mart Stores Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. August M Ladesma, III and August M. Ladesma, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
