Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Bell v. Hooper
as 2:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Bell
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell v. Hooper et al
as 2:2021cv01817
Plaintiff:
Dwight L Bell, Sr
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wallace v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2020cv02869
Defendant:
Louisiana State, John A Alario, Jr, Walter Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenneth Wallace, Sr and Charles Kenneth Wallace, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. State of Louisiana et al
as 2:2020cv02175
Defendant:
State of Louisiana and Darrel Vannoy
Plaintiff:
Clinton E. Bell
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Murray v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2018cv11561
Plaintiff:
Frederick Murray
Defendant:
Louisiana State, Sex Offender Registry Board, Jeff Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell, et al v. Etowah County Detention Center et al
as 2:2017cv08985
Plaintiff:
Tiffiny Lashea Bell, Amanda Leigh Turner Bishop, Carrie Adriana Mitchell and others
Defendant:
Etowah County Detention Center, Sarah Thomas and Brandy Fuller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Kent et al
as 2:2017cv07477
Plaintiff:
Dominique Lee Carter
Defendant:
Jason Kent, Dustin Bickham, Kenneth Booty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. USA
as 2:2016cv12120
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Shecory Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bell v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2015cv00882
Plaintiff:
Jessica Leigh Bell
Defendant:
Louisiana State
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bell v. Gusman et al
as 2:2015cv00747
Plaintiff:
Frank Donell Bell
Defendant:
Marlin N. Gusman , Carlos J. Louque and Bonita J. Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
