Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Porter v. Tynes et al
as 2:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Tomarcus Porter
Defendant:
Johnathan Tynes, Charles Griffin, Aaron Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Rabb et al
as 2:2023cv05865
Plaintiff:
Darryl Flanders Robinson
Defendant:
Steven Rabb, Ched Sanchez, Terrence Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spikes v. Executive Parole and Probation et al
as 2:2023cv01285
Plaintiff:
Jason J Spikes
Defendant:
Executive Parole and Probation and Aaron Moran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Harris v. Lopinto
as 2:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Harris, Jr
Defendant:
Joseph Lopinto, Brianne Carter, Aaron Savoie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilbert v. Glass et al
as 2:2022cv04564
Plaintiff:
Oneil Gilbert, III
Defendant:
Sgt Glass, Capt. Wilkie, Dep. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Bennett et al
as 2:2022cv04036
Plaintiff:
Tomarcus Porter
Defendant:
Aaron Bennett, Dillon Tynes, Lloyd Spears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arcement v. Lopinto et al
as 2:2022cv02888
Plaintiff:
Trayvon Ron Arcement
Defendant:
Joseph P. Lopinto, III, John Bel Edwards and Aaron Broussard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kitzler v. Hooper et al
as 2:2022cv01263
Plaintiff:
Aaron Kitzler
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthews et al v. Lo et al
as 2:2021cv01862
Plaintiff:
Cody M. Matthews, Frank William Beckendorf, III and Frank W. Beckendorf, III
Defendant:
William Lo, J. Ham, Aaron Mendow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mott v. Lafourche Parish
as 2:2021cv01564
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jabriel Mott
Defendant:
Lafourche Parish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
