Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Roussell v. Caldwell et al
as 2:2017cv00846
Plaintiff:
Calvin Andrew Roussell
Defendant:
James D. Caldwell
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Caldwell v. Bayer AG et al
as 2:2016cv14121
Plaintiff:
Ronald D. Caldwell
Defendant:
Bayer AG, Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Savoy v. Gusman et al
as 2:2015cv04906
Plaintiff:
Terry Francis Savoy
Defendant:
Marlin N. Gusman and James D. Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wallace et al v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2015cv04393
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenneth Wallace, Sr., Clarence Mays, John Strother and others
Defendant:
Louisiana State, James D. Caldwell, Louisiana Legislature and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peralta v. James D Caldwell, et al
as 2:2015cv01385
Plaintiff:
David Peralta
Defendant:
James D. Caldwell, Matthew B Derbes, David Weilbaecher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Jindal, et al
as 2:2015cv01283
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Bobby Jindal , James D. Caldwell , James LeBlanc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gates v. Swartz et al
as 2:2013cv06425
Plaintiff:
Shane M. Gates
Defendant:
Richard Swartz , Walter P Reed, Nicholas F. Noriea, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robicheaux v. Caldwell
as 2:2013cv05090
Defendant:
James D. Caldwell
Plaintiff:
Jonathan P. Robicheaux
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
King et al v. Jindal et al
as 2:2013cv04913
Defendant:
Bobby Jindal and James D. Caldwell
Plaintiff:
Terry King and Laura King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Southeast Louisiana Building and Construction Trades v. Jindal et al
as 2:2013cv00370
Plaintiff:
Southeast Louisiana Building and Construction Trades Council AFL-CIO
Defendant:
Bobby Jindal and James D. Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
