Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Kotevski v. Clinton et al
as 3:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Milan Michael Kotevski
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, William Jefferson Clinton, Estate of George H.W. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Gautreaux et al
as 3:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Joshua Smith
Defendant:
Sid Gautreaux, III, Aaron Johnson and East Baton Rouge Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. United Healthcare
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Tabbatha T. Johnson
Defendant:
United Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parish of Ascension v. Orgeron et al
as 3:2023cv01385
Plaintiff:
Parish of Ascension
Defendant:
Corey J. Orgeron
Counter Claimant:
Brandee Orgeron
Counter Defendant:
Clint Cointment and Patrice Frazier Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Payton v. Clayton et al
as 3:2023cv00329
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Payton
Defendant:
Judge Tony Clayton, Scott Stassi, Nedi Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. U.S. Postal Service
as 3:2022cv00498
Plaintiff:
Shelly Mae Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2022cv00244
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Alex Felix, Jhims Francois and others
Defendant:
Tae D. Johnson, Patrick J. Lechleitner, Ava Cates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Malprass et al
as 3:2021cv00561
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
David Malprass, World Bank CDC, Queen Elizabeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
