Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Burns v. Eastern Louisiana Mental Health System
as 3:2020cv00277
Defendant:
Eastern Louisiana Mental Health System
Plaintiff:
Clyde Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Hebert et al
as 3:2019cv00376
Defendant:
Troy Hebert and Kirk Frith
Plaintiff:
Clyde Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis et al v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00318
Plaintiff:
Otto Barrera, Clyde Carter, Ricky D. Davis and others
Unknown:
Jeffrey Dubner, Jeffrey Dubner, Jeffrey Dubner and others
Defendant:
Burl Cain, Stephanie Lamartiniere, James LeBlanc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fox v. EBR Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2014cv00588
Defendant:
Baton Rouge City Court, City Court Record Office, EBR Sheriff Office and others
Plaintiff:
Clyde Leon Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pines v. Hurst et al
as 3:2014cv00066
Defendant:
Cindy Hooge, Cliff Hurst, James LeBlanc and others
Interested Party:
William Kline
Plaintiff:
Micheal W. Pines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. USA
as 3:2012cv00116
Petitioner:
Clyde Bennett Mills
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Lynch v. Cooper
as 3:2011cv00855
Respondent:
Lynn Cooper
Petitioner:
Clyde Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dean v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2011cv00826
Defendant:
Neil Campbell, Eugene Ferguson, James LeBlanc and others
Plaintiff:
Noel Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman v. Prince et al
as 3:2010cv00605
Defendant:
Benoit Dinvaut, Howard Prince, Clyde Spain and others
Plaintiff:
Theoshamond Norman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Downing v. Prince et al
as 3:2010cv00216
Defendant:
Venja Anderson, Neal Cambell, Andrew Childs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
