Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Henry v. State of Louisiana
as 3:2023cv00547
Plaintiff:
Spencer Will Henry
Defendant:
State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaspard v. Unknown First Defendant et al
as 3:2019cv00478
Defendant:
Various United States Magistrate Judges, Unknown Department of Corrections Offender/Inmate Counsel Substitute (2 of 2), Simien & Simien, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Gaspard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Dixon Correctional Institute et al
as 3:2019cv00470
Defendant:
Unknown MacMurdo, Lekeshia Jackson, Dixon Correctional Institute and others
Plaintiff:
Ron Spencer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Rosso et al
as 3:2015cv00078
Defendant:
Burl Cain, John Doe, Chad Menzina and others
Plaintiff:
Edmond D. Spencer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2014cv00811
Defendant:
Unknown Correction Guards, Dept. of Forensic Coordinators, Unknown Dr.'s and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Drawsand, Spencer Ford, Tramaine A. Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. State of Lousisiana et al
as 3:2014cv00178
Defendant:
Burle Cain, State of Lousisiana and Unted States American
Plaintiff:
Spencer J. Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. Cain
as 3:2013cv00460
Respondent:
Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Edmond D. Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
George v. Thomas et al
as 3:2010cv00670
Plaintiff:
Preston George
Defendant:
Cathy Richardson, Unknown Spencer and Pat Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. State of Louisiana et al
as 3:2010cv00640
Defendant:
Amand Akwon, David Ankerbran, Unknown Ard and others
Plaintiff:
Kermit Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
