Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00372
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00716
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Burnett v. USA
as 3:2016cv00416
Petitioner:
Roy Sherman Burnett
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Williams et al v. Lambert et al
as 3:2016cv00251
Defendant:
Bridget Hanna, Sherman Jackson, Marilyn M. Lambert and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gomez et al v. McElroy Truck Lines, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00160
Plaintiff:
Michael Gomez and Rebecca Gomez
Defendant:
Hudson Insurance Company, McElroy Truck Lines, Inc. and Timathy Sherman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Ringo v. Ard et al
as 3:2015cv00713
Defendant:
ABC Insurances, Jason Ard, Unknown Beal and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Ringo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherman v. Louisiana Prison Enterprise et al
as 3:2013cv00349
Defendant:
Unknown Beckman, Unknown Butler, Unknown Calvin and others
Plaintiff:
Surge Sherman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gopalam v. Smith et al
as 3:2012cv00542
Defendant:
Rick Bennett, Officer David Breaux, Dr. Lance E Bullock and others
Plaintiff:
Gopinath Gopalam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moody v. Deschamp et al
as 3:2011cv00540
Defendant:
Bernie Deschamp, United States of America and XYZ Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Nun Cha Moody
Notice Only:
Sherman Stanford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Temple v. Sailormen, Inc et al
as 3:2010cv00558
Defendant:
Interfoods of America, Inc., Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company and Sailormen, Inc
Plaintiff:
Sherman Temple
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
