Cases 51 - 60 of 60
Jones et al v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, et al
as 3:2019cv00796
Defendant:
Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc, McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Rickey A. Jones
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Hedrick v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 3:2019cv00794
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Rite Aid Corporation, Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hedrick
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Edwards v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 3:2019cv00795
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc, McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Toney Edwards
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Pearl v. Walmart Louisiana, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00758
Defendant:
Walmart Supercenter Store, Walmart Inc., ABC Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Pearl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cosey v. Wal-Mart Louisiana, LLC, et al
as 3:2019cv00554
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, Wal-Mart Louisiana, LLC and Walmart, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Glyndlyn Cosey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haile v. Walmart, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00467
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. and ABC Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Stacy Haile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Monroe et al v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00310
Plaintiff:
Taylor Monroe, Ronald Monroe and Kristine Monroe
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. and Sam's West, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanderford v. Walmart Inc., et al
as 3:2019cv00292
Plaintiff:
Terry Sanderford
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bourgeois v. Walmart Inc.
as 3:2019cv00008
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Plaintiff:
Wanda Bourgeois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00337
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
