Cases 121 - 130 of 12,749
Lindsey v. R P D C Medical Dept et al
as 3:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Jamie H Lindsey
Defendant:
Medical Dept Richland Parish Detention Center, Kendra Vaughn and R P D C Medical Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. McKeithen et al
as 3:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Woods
Defendant:
Jack McKeithen, Kevin Wyles, David Callender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Neal v. Jansen
as 2:2024cv00515
Plaintiff:
Timothy O'Neal
Defendant:
S Jansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Office v. Raymond Laborde Correctional Center
as 1:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
Brandon J Office
Defendant:
Raymond Laborde Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Borges-Milko v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Vilomar Borges-Milko and Milko Vilomar-Borge
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Foster v. Dauzat
as 5:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dewayne Foster
Defendant:
Michele Dauzat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moncrief v. Lafayette City Police, et al
as 6:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
Damien Rashad Moncrief
Defendant:
Todd Reid, Tyier Mitcham, Angerer Holden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCray v. Wade
as 3:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
John McCray
Defendant:
Tyler Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tabor v. State of Louisiana Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Tony Joseph Tabor
Defendant:
State of LA Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayorga-Gonzalez v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Jesus Mayorga-Gonzalez
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
