Cases 71 - 80 of 179
Smith v. Public Safety & Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv02892
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel M Smith
Defendant:
Dept of Public Safety & Corrections, Cooley , Yusof Abdullah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanna v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2015cv02851
Plaintiff:
Mark Hanna
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, LA Dept of Public Safety & Corrections and LA Dept of Motor Vehicles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Daniels v. Cason et al
as 5:2015cv02746
Plaintiff:
Dominick Lavar Daniels
Defendant:
Alford Cason, Brown, Burt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Aronald et al
as 5:2015cv02580
Plaintiff:
Calvin Horton
Defendant:
James Aronald, Rachel, L Nail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Lee et al
as 5:2015cv02365
Plaintiff:
Erwin Darnell Coleman
Defendant:
Lee, Willie Shaw, Police Dept of Shreveport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. LA Dept of Public Safety & Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv02180
Plaintiff:
Jacob McCalister Bell, Sr
Defendant:
LA Dept of Public Safety & Corrections, James LeBlanc, River Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Jindal et al
as 5:2015cv01707
Plaintiff:
Calvin Horton
Defendant:
Bobby Jindal, James LeBlanc, Gibbs Whalen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francis v. LA Dept of Public Safety & Corrections
as 5:2015cv01454
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Francis
Defendant:
LA Dept of Public Safety & Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Preston v. Public Safety & Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv00583
Defendant:
LA Dept of Public Safety & Corrections, Nate Cain, Kent Gremillion and others
Plaintiff:
George Andrew Preston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Public Safety & Corrections
as 5:2015cv00206
Plaintiff:
Kevin Morris
Defendant:
LA Dept of Public Safety & Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.