Cases 1 - 10 of 414
Lambert v. Hooper
as 6:2024cv01206
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lambert
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andrus et al v. Crowley et al
as 6:2024cv01160
Defendant:
Officer Tim Terro, Mayor Chad Monceaux, Officer Paul Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Trevor Jules Davis and Jonte Douglas Andrus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Crowley et al
as 6:2024cv01099
Defendant:
Officer Paul Miller, Mayor Chad Monceaux, City of Crowley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bushnell v. Warden
as 6:2024cv00903
Plaintiff:
Michael Bushnell, Sr
Defendant:
Warden and Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Hooper
as 5:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Calvin Walker
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leet v. Cotone et al
as 6:2024cv00586
Not Yet Classified:
Government of Iberia Parish
Plaintiff:
Heath Leet
Defendant:
Tim Cotone, Deputy Kaila Chipman, Iberia Parish Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mays v. Hooper
as 3:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
Cameron Hays and Cameron Mays
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willis v. Huck et al
as 5:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
Tommy Willis
Defendant:
Tim Huck and Club Phoenix 2.0
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Hooper
as 5:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Phillip Orlando Ealy Johnson
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
