Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Lafitte Investments II L L C v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London et al
as 3:2023cv01771
Plaintiff:
Lafitte Investments II, LLC and Lafitte Investments II L L C
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, Indian Harbor Insurance Company, QBE Specialty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
M K Mall Holdings L L C v. Underwriters at Lloyds of London et al
as 6:2023cv01455
Plaintiff:
MK Mall Holdings, LLC and M K Mall Holdings L L C
Defendant:
Underwriters at Lloyds, of London, Indian Harbor Insurance Company, QBE Specialty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London subscribing to Policy No. AMR-42386-05 et al v. Cameron Parish Police Jury
as 2:2022cv05345
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London subscribing to Policy No. AMR-42386-05, Indian Harbor Insurance Company, QBE Specialty Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Cameron Parish Police Jury and Police Jury of Cameron Parish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London et al v. Cameron Parish Recreation #6
as 2:2022cv05286
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London subscribing to Policy No. AMR-60898-02, Indian Harbor Insurance Company, QBE Specialty Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Cameron Parish Recreation #6
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Zagis USA L L C v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London et al
as 2:2022cv02189
Plaintiff:
Zagis USA, LLC and Zagis U S A L L C
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, Indian Harbor Insurance Co, QBE Specialty Insurance Company and others
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
J M K 5 Texas City L L C et al v. AmRisc L P et al
as 5:2022cv01041
Plaintiff:
JMK5 Texas City LLC, JMK5 Shreveport LLC, J M K 5 Texas City L L C and others
Defendant:
AmRisc L L C, Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, HDI Global Specialty SE and others
Counter Claimant:
General Security Indemnity Co of Arizona, H D I Global Specialty S E and Gneral Security Indemnity Co of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Monroe Warehouse Co L L C et al v. Global Excess Partners Inc et al
as 3:2022cv00617
Plaintiff:
Monroe Warehouse Company, LLC, Broyles Warehouse, LLC, Monroe Warehouse Co L L C and others
Defendant:
Global Excess Partners, Inc, Lloyd's Syndicates, HDI Global Specialty SE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Subscribing to Policy No AMR-67622-01 et al v. Southwest Louisiana Charter Academy Foundation Inc
as 2:2021cv04342
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. AMR-67622-01, HDI Global Specialty SE, Evanston Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Southwest Louisiana Charter Academy Foundation, Inc. and Southwest Louisiana Charter Academy Foundation Inc
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vintage Realty Co L L C et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London severally subscribing to Certificate No AMR-59283-03
as 2:2021cv04301
Plaintiff:
Vintage Realty Co, Nelson Pointe Apartment Homes, LLC, Vintage Realty Co L L C and others
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, Indian Harbor Insurance Co, QBE Specialty Insurance Company and others
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Vintage Realty Co et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London et al
as 1:2021cv04300
Plaintiff:
Vintage Realty Co and Nelson Pointe Apartment Homes, LLC
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, Indian Harbor Insurance Co, QBE Specialty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
