Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Loftin & LeBlanc, LLC v. AmGuard Insurance Co
as 2:2022cv02883
Plaintiff:
Loftin & LeBlanc L L C
Defendant:
AmGuard Insurance Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Stewart v. Loftin et al
as 3:2021cv03789
Plaintiff:
Glen Stewart
Defendant:
Caleb Loftin, Justin Morris, Doe Officers 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loftin et al v. Progressive Property Insurance Co
as 2:2021cv02350
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Plaintiff:
Billy E Loftin and Phyllis Loftin
Defendant:
Progressive Property Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Millet v. Lake Charles et al
as 2:2020cv00396
Defendant:
John Thacker, Officer Smith, City of Lake Charles and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Millet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Loftin et al
as 5:2016cv01226
Plaintiff:
Jack King
Defendant:
Gary Loftin and Charles R Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Scott et al
as 5:2016cv01106
Plaintiff:
Dion Lewis
Defendant:
Charles R Scott and Gary Loftin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Loftin et al
as 5:2016cv00052
Defendant:
Gary Loftin, Dale Cox, Asst District Attorney Caddo Parish and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chisolm v. Loftin et al
as 5:2016cv00053
Defendant:
Gary Loftin, Dale Cox, Asst District Attorney Caddo Parish and others
Plaintiff:
William Chisolm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Musgrove v. Loftin et al
as 5:2016cv00050
Plaintiff:
Ronny Musgrove
Defendant:
Gary Loftin, Dale Cox, Asst District Attorney Caddo Parish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Loftin et al
as 5:2016cv00054
Defendant:
Gary Loftin, Asst District Attorney Caddo Parish, District Attorneys Office Caddo Parish and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
