Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01058
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Woods v. Carijival et al
as 1:2017cv00289
Plaintiff:
Carlos Woods
Defendant:
M D Carijival, M A Stancial, K Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Arbuckle et al
as 5:2015cv01965
Plaintiff:
Roy R Jones
Defendant:
Rodney Arbuckle, Rick Pharris, Robert E Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Triple J J J Travel Plaza Inc et al
as 5:2015cv01235
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Triple J J J Travel Plaza Inc , Bill Jones , Donna R Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Jones et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Co
as 6:2014cv02541
Plaintiff:
Constance Jones , Jones Ernest, Sr , E'mon Jones and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. McHugh
as 2:2013cv02995
Plaintiff:
Stephanie R Jones
Defendant:
John M McHugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bell v. Gotreaux et al
as 1:2013cv00746
Plaintiff:
Christopher C Bell, Sr
Defendant:
Gotreaux, Dixon, Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America Inc et al
as 6:2012cv00408
Plaintiff:
Dan R Jones and Sheila M Bacon
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc , Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitehead v. White & Case L L P et al
as 5:2012cv00399
Plaintiff:
David Louis Whitehead
Defendant:
White & Case L L P, Wallpark L L C, Paul L Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Jones et al
as 5:2011cv01471
Plaintiff:
Vester Johnson
Defendant:
Julie C Jones, William R Jones, District Attorney Red River Parish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
