Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Couvillon v. Cintas Corp #2
as 6:2022cv01658
Plaintiff:
Kim E Couvillon
Defendant:
Cintas Corp #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
J Duncan Enterprises L L C et al v. Cintas Corp #2
as 1:2022cv00692
Plaintiff:
J. Duncan Enterprises, LLC, JV Duncan Investments, LLC, J Duncan Enterprises L L C and others
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation No. 2 and Cintas Corp #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Coleman et al v. Walmart Inc et al
as 6:2021cv01461
Plaintiff:
Billie Coleman and David Coleman
Defendant:
Walmart Inc and Cintas Corporation No 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00248
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Dupuis v. Cintas Corp
as 6:2020cv00496
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation d/b/a Cintas Lafayette
Plaintiff:
Theresa Dupuis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Placide et al v. Cintas Corp #2 et al
as 6:2020cv00195
Defendant:
Cintas Corp #2 and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Anthony Placide and Zephelfilia Broussard Placide
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Peterson et al v. Applebees Restaurants L L C
as 5:2018cv01215
Defendant:
Cintas Corp #2, Apple Arkansas Inc and Applebees Restaurant L L C
Plaintiff:
Mell Peterson and Clarence Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Forte v. Walmart Inc et al
as 1:2018cv00907
Defendant:
G & K Services L L C, Wal-Mart Louisiana L L C, Walmart Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Shelia Forte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Binns et al v. Travelers Indemnity Co of Connecticut et al
as 3:2014cv00388
Plaintiff:
Melba Binns and Frederick Binns
Defendant:
Travelers Indemnity Co of Connecticut , Cintas Corp , Cintas Corp #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
P H I v. Cintas Corp
as 6:2011cv01809
Plaintiff:
P H I
Defendant:
Cintas Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
