Cases 81 - 90 of 4,349
Jamimani v. Every US President after President Richard M. Nixon et al
as 1:2024cv11672
Defendant:
The Nation of Islam and All Nazi, Robert Crane and Every US President after President Richard M. Nixon
Plaintiff:
Chosen One Jamimani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lu v. Dargie et al
as 3:2024cv30081
Defendant:
Lawrence F. Army, Jr., Ann E Dargie and Cindy Shippee
Plaintiff:
Kang Lu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mancini v. City of Springfield et al
as 3:2024cv30080
Defendant:
City of Springfield, MGM Springfield and Massachusetts Police Department
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L. Mancini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gary v. Gary et al
as 1:2024cv11603
Plaintiff:
Robert L Gary
Defendant:
Frederick Gary and Boston Police (B3) District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Weinberg v. Mangal et al
as 1:2024cv11606
Defendant:
Ann Graybiel, Spero and Jorgenson, P.C., Kimberly Budd and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Paul Weinberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Baylies v. Lavigne et al
as 1:2024cv11591
Defendant:
Evan T Lavigne and Michael J. Breen
Plaintiff:
Daniel M. Baylies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kersey v. Deal Mayor
as 1:2024cv11577
Plaintiff:
George Kersey
Defendant:
Deal Mayor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Perez v. Springfield Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv30079
Plaintiff:
Margarita Perez
Defendant:
Department of Children and Families, Cassie Dawn and Springfield Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swint v. T-Mobile et al
as 1:2024cv11536
Defendant:
T-MOBILE, Mint Mobile and Sprint
Plaintiff:
Robert James Swint
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gary v. Dorchester Court et al
as 1:2024cv11529
Defendant:
Dorchester Court and Attorney Stuart
Plaintiff:
Robert L Gary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
