Cases 111 - 120 of 8,683
Wojcik et al v. Button
as 4:2024cv40094
Defendant:
ROBERT BUTTON
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. WOJCIK and JEAN A. WOJCIK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
DeWayne et al v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2024cv11747
Defendant:
U.S. District Courts for the District of Massachusetts and U.S. Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Bishop Ruben DeWayne and Leitta Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Randall v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2024cv11729
Defendant:
Lev, Rudy the Break Dancer, Bishop Darren Simpson and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Randall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Liu v. President and Fellows of Harvard College
as 1:2024cv11715
Defendant:
President and Fellows of Harvard College
Plaintiff:
Xianwen Liu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pidge v. Healey et al
as 1:2024cv11698
Defendant:
Belmont Police Department, Toll Brothers, Toll Brothers Corporate Office and others
Plaintiff:
Janet J. Pidge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kersey v. Chewy Corporation
as 1:2024cv11713
Plaintiff:
George Kersey
Defendant:
Chewy Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11473
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ra dais deapocalypse bey v. Springfield Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv30083
Defendant:
Jeffrey Martucci, Hampden County Correctional Center, Jaime Bruno and others
Plaintiff:
ra dais deapocalypse bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
