Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102
Edokobi v. Coakley Realty Management, LLC et al
as 8:2017cv02825
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Edokobi
Defendant:
Coakley Realty Management, LLC, Rory Coakley, Donnie Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edokobi v. U.S. General Services Administration et al
as 8:2017cv02469
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Edokobi
Defendant:
U.S. General Services Administration, Timothy Horne, Office of Inspector General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas et al v. State of Maryland et al
as 8:2017cv01739
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thomas and Alexandra Curbelo
Defendant:
State of Maryland , Larry Hogan , Anne Arundel County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wallace v. Calvert County Public Schools
as 8:2016cv03242
Plaintiff:
Teba Ieshawn Wallace
Defendant:
Calvert County Public Schools, Ed Cassidy, Chuck Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jarvis v. Prince George's County Maryland et al
as 8:2016cv02961
Plaintiff:
Derek N. Jarvis
Defendant:
Prince George's County Maryland, Rushern L. Baker, III and Prince George's County Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00009
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mack v. OTTENBERGS BAKERS, INC
as 1:2016cv00009
Defendant:
OTTENBERGS BAKERS, INC
Plaintiff:
Clarence Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
