Cases 31 - 40 of 482
Younger-Dean v. GM Subsystems Manufacturing, LLC
as 2:2023cv10076
Plaintiff:
David Younger-Dean
Defendant:
General Motors LLC and GM Subsystems Manufacturing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv13000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Nielsen et al v. Ann Arbor Public Schools et al
as 2:2022cv12632
Plaintiff:
David Nielsen, S.N. and Skyline Republican Club
Defendant:
Ann Arbor Public Schools, Jefferson Bilsborrow and Cory McElmeel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hurley v. King et al
as 2:2022cv12408
Plaintiff:
David Douglas Hurley
Defendant:
Jeff King, Anthony Bateman, L. Dickson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Orr v. Busacca et al
as 2:2022cv12280
Plaintiff:
Larry Eugene Orr
Defendant:
David Busacca, Brian Kolodziej [E-filer], Detective Michael Gerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McPhaul et al v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2022cv11987
Plaintiff:
Rudy McPhaul and David Richbow
Defendant:
City of Detroit, Nathan Miller, Alexis Jackson and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Deering v. Oakland County et al
as 2:2022cv11809
Plaintiff:
Juwan Deering
Defendant:
Oakland County, David Wurtz, Denise Reis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11778
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
