Cases 11 - 20 of 125,326
Upton-Hughes v. Woodward Detroit CVS, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2024cv11685
Plaintiff:
Debra Upton-Hughes
Defendant:
Woodward Detroit CVS, L.L.C., CVS/Pharmacy 8026, CVS/Pharmacy 8068 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2024cv11687
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
LaFleur v. Prudential Financial Incorporated
as 4:2024cv11681
Plaintiff:
Cassidy LaFleur
Defendant:
Prudential Financial Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Moore v. Life Insurance Company Of North America
as 2:2024cv11680
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Moore
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company Of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Cargill v. Monroe County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv11659
Plaintiff:
Alicia Nicole Cargill
Defendant:
Monroe County Jail, Tilman L. Crutchfield, John Doe and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024md00001
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Johnson, M.D. v. Johnson
as 2:2024cv11673
Plaintiff:
Amos C Johnson, M.D.
Defendant:
Rita Elizabeth Johnson
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
