Cases 81 - 90 of 600
Harp v. Austin et al
as 2:2021cv12446
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harp
Defendant:
Kristine Austin, Sirena Landfair, Brian Strickland and others
El Amer I v. Detroit Police Department et al
as 2:2021cv12108
Plaintiff:
El Pharoah El Amer I
Defendant:
Detroit Police Department, Michigan Department of Corrections, Wayne County Prosecutor and others
Karacson v. State of Michigan et al
as 2:2021cv12101
Plaintiff:
Steve Ellis Karacson
Defendant:
State of Michigan, Michigan Department of Corrections, Wayne County Jail and others
Karacson v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 1:2021cv12102
Plaintiff:
Steve Ellis Karacson
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Whitley v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2021cv11995
Plaintiff:
PR of Est. Edna Whitley
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Gregory Skipper, George Whitinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clay v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 2:2021cv11880
Plaintiff:
Latreesa Clay
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Jodi L Angelo, Sherri Sankey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonser v. Shipman, et al
as 2:2021cv11425
Plaintiff:
Craig Hamilton Gonser
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Michigan Parole Board, Brian Shipman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Abcumby v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv11281
Defendant:
Heidi E Washington, Officer Frye, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Keshuna Abcumby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv10317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Robinson v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv10133
Petitioner:
Christopher Robinson
Respondent:
Dana Nessel, Michigan Department of Corrections and J. Franks
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
