Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Hargitan v. Woodward Detroit CVS, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv10782
Plaintiff:
Deanne Hargitan
Defendant:
Woodward Detroit CVS, L.L.C. d/b/a CVS Pharmacy, ADI Realty, Inc. and Woodward Detroit CVS, LLC Doing business as CVS Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hall et al v. Paint Creek Estates et al
as 2:2022cv11449
Plaintiff:
Jeff Hall and Deann Nash
Defendant:
Paint Creek Estates, Brandon Semran, Beth Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hardin et al v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 2:2022cv10023
Plaintiff:
Raymond Goda Hardin, Shantia Deann James and Ashley Simpson
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ashh, Inc. v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv11210
Plaintiff:
Ashh, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Customs and Border Protection, Commissioner, United States Customs and Border Protection, Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv10860
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barger et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11320
Plaintiff:
Jesse Petary, Thomas Masterson, Christopher Spencer and others
Defendant:
Robert Bosch GmbH, Robert Bosch LLC and General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Burkitt v. Social Security, Commissioner
as 2:2011cv15687
Plaintiff:
DeAnn L. Burkitt
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Pylak et al v. K-Lin Enterprises, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv10001
Plaintiff:
Deann A Pylak and Gary D Sturgill
Defendant:
K-Lin Enterprises, LLC , Robert Gawne and Donald Gasparovich
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McBrayer v. Maike et al
as 2:2008cv11902
Plaintiff:
Deann A McBrayer
Defendant:
Aaron J Maike and Baker College of Allen Park
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
