Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Adams Outdoor Advertising Limited Partnership v. East Lansing, City of et al
as 1:2018cv00279
Plaintiff:
Adams Outdoor Advertising Limited Partnership
Defendant:
East Lansing, City of and Scott Weaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams Outdoor Advertising Limited Partnership v. East Lansing, City of et al
as 1:2018cv00020
Plaintiff:
Adams Outdoor Advertising Limited Partnership
Defendant:
East Lansing, City of and Scott Weaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antol et al v. Dent et al
as 1:2017cv00613
Plaintiff:
Derek Antol and Tryston Antol
Defendant:
Adam Dent, Casey Bringedahl, Casey Trucks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antol et al v. Dent et al
as 1:2017cv00612
Plaintiff:
Derek Antol and Tryston Antol
Defendant:
Adam Dent, Trooper Vogt, Casey Bringedahl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Boyce et al v. Michigan State University et al
as 1:2017cv00222
Defendant:
Michigan State University, John Geddert, Board of Trustees of Michigan State University and others
Plaintiff:
Doe, Jonathan Collins, Amanda Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01293
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Saboury v. Lansing, City of et al
as 1:2016cv00885
Plaintiff:
Sam Saboury
Defendant:
Lansing, City of, Carol Wood, Jody Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Adams v. Calhoun, County of et al
as 1:2016cv00678
Plaintiff:
Barry Wayne Adams
Defendant:
Calhoun, County of , Michigan, State of , Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sommer v. Newaygo, County of et al
as 1:2015cv00921
Plaintiff:
David Sommer
Defendant:
Newaygo, County of and Adam Mercer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blaskowski v. Minnesota, State of et al
as 1:2015cv00422
Plaintiff:
Adam Blaskowski
Defendant:
Minnesota, State of and Additional Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
