Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Reilly v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 1:2009cv00892
Plaintiff:
Joshua Reilly
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans With Disabilities Act- Enforcement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disability Act for Handicappers
Moss v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv00499
Plaintiff:
Edwardo Moss
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Unknown Nair, Unknown King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Heyerman v. Calhoun, County of et al
as 1:2009cv00411
Plaintiff:
Buxton Craig Heyerman
Defendant:
Calhoun, County of, Calhoun County Prosecutor's Office, Susan K. Mladenoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
White #285964 v. Williams et al
as 2:2007cv00220
Plaintiff:
Kala White #285964
Defendant:
Christopher Williams, Michigan Department of Corrections, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
